Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Personal tools

Mammography & Breast Imaging

Sections

Education
- Resident Resources
- Fellowship Resources
- Medical Student Resources
- Breast Imaging Teaching Files
  - Teaching Files
    - Case 1
    - Case 2
    - Case 3
    - Case 4
    - Case 5
    - Case 6
    - Case 7
    - Case 8
    - Case 9
    - Case 10
    - Case 11
      - Case 11 continued
      - Case 11 Answer
      - Case 11 Answer 2
    - Case 12
    - Case 13
    - Case 16
    - Case 17
    - Case 18
    - Case 19
    - Case 20
    - Case 21
    - Case 22
    - Case 23
    - Case 24
    - Case 25
    - Case 26
    - Case 27
    - Case 29
    - Case 30
    - Case 33
    - Case 34
    - Case 35
    - Case 36
    - Case 37
    - Case 38
    - Case 39
    - Case 40
    - Case 41
    - Case 42
    - Case 44
    - Case 45
    - Case 46
    - Case 47
    - Case 48
    - Case 50
    - Case 51
    - Case 52
    - Case 53
    - Case 54
    - Case 55
    - Case 56
    - Case 57
    - Case 58
    - Case 59
    - Case 60
    - Case 61
    - Case 62
    - Case 105
    - Case 106
    - Case 107
    - Case 108
    - Case 111
    - Case 112
    - Case 113
    - Case 114
    - Case 109
    - Case 110
    - Case 115
    - Case 116
    - Case 117
    - Case 118
    - Case 119
    - Case 120
    - Case 121
    - Case 122
Research
Location
For Patients
For Medical Professionals
Our People
Events

You are here: → → → → → → → →

Case 11 Answer

BI-RADS 4, Suspicious. These are heterogeneous grouped microcalcifications, and are suspicious for malignancy.

A stereotactic biopsy is performed which yields Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia. What is your recommendation now?

Document Actions

Contact the UW Department of Radiology

Information about the accessibility tools built into this site

Request features or report problems with this website